If you are weighing IVF, at home or abroad, the most important number is also the most often misrepresented. This page gives you the honest version: where the real figures come from, how to read them, and how to tell a fair success rate from a flattering one.
Honest success by age band
The chart below shows live-birth rate per intended egg retrieval from the US Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) 2024 reporting, using your own eggs. "Per intended egg retrieval" is one of the more honest denominators because it counts every cycle that set out to produce a baby, not only the ones that reached an embryo transfer.
Source: SART CORS 2024, live birth per intended egg retrieval, own eggs. 2024 data labelled preliminary.
Per transfer vs per cycle vs per retrieval: the trick is the denominator
The single biggest way success rates mislead is the denominator. The same clinic, same patients, can honestly publish very different percentages depending on what they divide by:
| How it is measured | What it counts | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Per embryo transfer | Only cycles that reached a transfer | Highest number. Excludes cancelled cycles and poor responders. |
| Per intended egg retrieval | Every cycle that started a retrieval | Lower, more honest. Includes cycles with no usable embryo. |
| Per cycle started | Every cycle begun | Lower still. The European ESHRE registry’s delivery rate per aspiration was about 16% (IVF) in 2019. |
| Cumulative (per egg collection, all transfers) | Fresh plus all frozen transfers from one retrieval | Can be higher, and is the fairest view of one retrieval over time. |
None of these is dishonest on its own. The dishonesty is quoting the highest one without saying so. When a clinic advertises "60% success," your only useful follow-up is: per what, and for which age group?
What a clinic’s "60% success" really means
A 60% headline is almost always per transfer, for the most favourable age band, sometimes with donor eggs included. For a 39-year-old using her own eggs, the honest per-retrieval figure is closer to 18%. That is not a reason to give up; it is a reason to plan for more than one cycle and to budget accordingly. Clinics that show you per-cycle figures for your age, without prompting, are the ones to trust.
The donor-egg exception
Egg donation changes the maths because success tracks the donor’s age, not the patient’s. European ESHRE registries show fresh donor-egg pregnancy rates per transfer around 50–51%, versus roughly 33–35% for own-egg IVF. That gap reflects the youth of donor eggs, not a property of donation itself. It is why donor cycles are often recommended at older maternal ages, and why their success figures should never be blended with own-egg numbers in a single advertised rate.
Cumulative vs single-cycle
One retrieval can yield several embryos, and transferring them across multiple attempts raises the chance of an eventual birth. So a single-cycle figure can understate your real chance over a full course of treatment, while a per-transfer figure overstates the chance of any one attempt. Ask your clinic for the cumulative live-birth rate per egg retrieval for your age. It is the number that best answers "what is my realistic chance of a baby from this?"
Red flags in clinic marketing
- A headline success rate with no denominator and no age group attached.
- Donor-egg results blended into a general "our success rate."
- Rates that do not fall with age (real own-egg rates always do).
- "Guarantee" or "money-back" programmes presented as evidence of high success rather than as financial products.
- Selecting only the best-prognosis patients, then quoting the group’s results to everyone.
Read this alongside our cost-by-country guide and the Eligibility + Cost Finder: honest odds plus honest cost is the only fair basis for a decision this important.